Talk:Wish list - Revision history

Diccon at 14:29, 22 January 2009

2009-01-22T14:29:36Z

Diccon at 18:29, 8 December 2008

2008-12-08T18:29:35Z

Tomh at 03:02, 7 December 2008

2008-12-07T03:02:10Z

Diccon at 19:03, 6 December 2008

2008-12-06T19:03:00Z

Tomh at 10:50, 2 December 2008

2008-12-02T10:50:34Z

Diccon at 03:26, 2 December 2008

2008-12-02T03:26:50Z

Karaken12: QPROC system call?

2008-12-02T00:42:58Z

QPROC system call?

Diccon at 22:19, 1 December 2008

2008-12-01T22:19:33Z

Tomh at 18:19, 1 December 2008

2008-12-01T18:19:02Z

Karaken12: Need a bug tracker.

2008-12-01T13:03:47Z

Need a bug tracker.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I wonder how we can restructure it so there is one discussion area for each item on the page, rather than one discussion for the whole page.
 :We need a proper bug-tracker, I think.  Then we can get a much better idea of what's going on.  P.S. Remember to sign comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>:  [[User:Karaken12|karaken12]] 13:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
@@ Line 11: / Line 12: @@
 :::::: I can't necessarily speak for Glen, but as I recall, you are correct. It was the rewrite of QPROC (which, I beleive, Glen was waiting on) as this was needed to be able to 'plug' the xml stuff into it, so as to not have to duplicate anything. This is something that deserves to be on this list, if anyone would want to attempt it. -[[User:Tomh|Tomh]] 20:00, 6 December 2008
 :::::::Ok, good start. Glen, when you can. What form of access do you need. (I may look up the orginal dialog on this as i know Glen has his hands full) -[[User:Diccon|Diccon]] 18:29, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:29, 8 December 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::: :) Its ok Tom, not offended, just throwing ideas about, and when the person who was meant to know the details (Glen and TomP) asks what this is then i get the feeling i missed the jist of it lol. As far as i understood, there was something with Procs which needed doing, Martin had suggested it was a big job but he would do it. And it never got done, thus killing the XML output. Possibly the qproc rewrite, but i know nothing :) -[[User:Diccon\|Diccon]] 19:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)		::::: :) Its ok Tom, not offended, just throwing ideas about, and when the person who was meant to know the details (Glen and TomP) asks what this is then i get the feeling i missed the jist of it lol. As far as i understood, there was something with Procs which needed doing, Martin had suggested it was a big job but he would do it. And it never got done, thus killing the XML output. Possibly the qproc rewrite, but i know nothing :) -[[User:Diccon\|Diccon]] 19:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
	:::::: I can't necessarily speak for Glen, but as I recall, you are correct. It was the rewrite of QPROC (which, I beleive, Glen was waiting on) as this was needed to be able to 'plug' the xml stuff into it, so as to not have to duplicate anything. This is something that deserves to be on this list, if anyone would want to attempt it. -[[User:Tomh\|Tomh]] 20:00, 6 December 2008		:::::: I can't necessarily speak for Glen, but as I recall, you are correct. It was the rewrite of QPROC (which, I beleive, Glen was waiting on) as this was needed to be able to 'plug' the xml stuff into it, so as to not have to duplicate anything. This is something that deserves to be on this list, if anyone would want to attempt it. -[[User:Tomh\|Tomh]] 20:00, 6 December 2008
		+	:::::::Ok, good start. Glen, when you can. What form of access do you need. (I may look up the orginal dialog on this as i know Glen has his hands full) -[[User:Diccon\|Diccon]] 18:29, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:02, 7 December 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::::Sorry if I offended, I was just trying to figure out what you meant. This helps, you talking about the 'qproc rewrite'? This sounds like it may be important, and a monumental undertaking. -Tomh 548am 2 December 2008		::::Sorry if I offended, I was just trying to figure out what you meant. This helps, you talking about the 'qproc rewrite'? This sounds like it may be important, and a monumental undertaking. -Tomh 548am 2 December 2008
	::::: :) Its ok Tom, not offended, just throwing ideas about, and when the person who was meant to know the details (Glen and TomP) asks what this is then i get the feeling i missed the jist of it lol. As far as i understood, there was something with Procs which needed doing, Martin had suggested it was a big job but he would do it. And it never got done, thus killing the XML output. Possibly the qproc rewrite, but i know nothing :) -[[User:Diccon\|Diccon]] 19:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)		::::: :) Its ok Tom, not offended, just throwing ideas about, and when the person who was meant to know the details (Glen and TomP) asks what this is then i get the feeling i missed the jist of it lol. As far as i understood, there was something with Procs which needed doing, Martin had suggested it was a big job but he would do it. And it never got done, thus killing the XML output. Possibly the qproc rewrite, but i know nothing :) -[[User:Diccon\|Diccon]] 19:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::: I can't necessarily speak for Glen, but as I recall, you are correct. It was the rewrite of QPROC (which, I beleive, Glen was waiting on) as this was needed to be able to 'plug' the xml stuff into it, so as to not have to duplicate anything. This is something that deserves to be on this list, if anyone would want to attempt it. -[[User:Tomh\|Tomh]] 20:00, 6 December 2008

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:03, 6 December 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::Screw it, removed it, was just trying to get the XML parser 'un blocked'. Previously I got lots of ''"ahh nods"'' responses -[[User:Diccon\|Diccon]] 03:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)		:::Screw it, removed it, was just trying to get the XML parser 'un blocked'. Previously I got lots of ''"ahh nods"'' responses -[[User:Diccon\|Diccon]] 03:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
	::::Sorry if I offended, I was just trying to figure out what you meant. This helps, you talking about the 'qproc rewrite'? This sounds like it may be important, and a monumental undertaking. -Tomh 548am 2 December 2008		::::Sorry if I offended, I was just trying to figure out what you meant. This helps, you talking about the 'qproc rewrite'? This sounds like it may be important, and a monumental undertaking. -Tomh 548am 2 December 2008
		+	::::: :) Its ok Tom, not offended, just throwing ideas about, and when the person who was meant to know the details (Glen and TomP) asks what this is then i get the feeling i missed the jist of it lol. As far as i understood, there was something with Procs which needed doing, Martin had suggested it was a big job but he would do it. And it never got done, thus killing the XML output. Possibly the qproc rewrite, but i know nothing :) -[[User:Diccon\|Diccon]] 19:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:50, 2 December 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::Agreed, I'm not quite sure what the issue is here. :o) -[[User:Karaken12\|karaken12]] 00:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)		::Agreed, I'm not quite sure what the issue is here. :o) -[[User:Karaken12\|karaken12]] 00:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
	:::Screw it, removed it, was just trying to get the XML parser 'un blocked'. Previously I got lots of ''"ahh nods"'' responses -[[User:Diccon\|Diccon]] 03:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)		:::Screw it, removed it, was just trying to get the XML parser 'un blocked'. Previously I got lots of ''"ahh nods"'' responses -[[User:Diccon\|Diccon]] 03:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::Sorry if I offended, I was just trying to figure out what you meant. This helps, you talking about the 'qproc rewrite'? This sounds like it may be important, and a monumental undertaking. -Tomh 548am 2 December 2008

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 "QPROC system call." - Could we have more information on this? -Tomh 13:17, 1 December 2008
-:Agreed, I'm not quite sure what the issue is here.  :o) -[[User:Karaken12|karaken12]] 00:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
+:I was just whacking down Glen B's requirement for proceeding with his XML parser/engine. Glen, TomP you know more about this than i do [[User:Diccon|Diccon]] 22:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
+::Agreed, I'm not quite sure what the issue is here.  :o) -[[User:Karaken12|karaken12]] 00:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
+:::Screw it, removed it, was just trying to get the XML parser 'un blocked'. Previously I got lots of ''"ahh *nods*"'' responses -[[User:Diccon|Diccon]] 03:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:42, 2 December 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:

	"QPROC system call." - Could we have more information on this? -Tomh 13:17, 1 December 2008		"QPROC system call." - Could we have more information on this? -Tomh 13:17, 1 December 2008
		+	:Agreed, I'm not quite sure what the issue is here. :o) -[[User:Karaken12\|karaken12]] 00:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


	I was just whacking down Glen B's requirement for proceeding with his XML parser/engine. Glen, TomP you know more about this than i do [[User:Diccon\|Diccon]] 22:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)		I was just whacking down Glen B's requirement for proceeding with his XML parser/engine. Glen, TomP you know more about this than i do [[User:Diccon\|Diccon]] 22:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 1 December 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:

	"QPROC system call." - Could we have more information on this? -Tomh 13:17, 1 December 2008		"QPROC system call." - Could we have more information on this? -Tomh 13:17, 1 December 2008
		+
		+
		+	I was just whacking down Glen B's requirement for proceeding with his XML parser/engine. Glen, TomP you know more about this than i do [[User:Diccon\|Diccon]] 22:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 1 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I wonder how we can restructure it so there is one discussion area for each item on the page, rather than one discussion for the whole page.		I wonder how we can restructure it so there is one discussion area for each item on the page, rather than one discussion for the whole page.
	:We need a proper bug-tracker, I think. Then we can get a much better idea of what's going on. P.S. Remember to sign comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>: [[User:Karaken12\|karaken12]] 13:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)		:We need a proper bug-tracker, I think. Then we can get a much better idea of what's going on. P.S. Remember to sign comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>: [[User:Karaken12\|karaken12]] 13:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	"QPROC system call." - Could we have more information on this? -Tomh 13:17, 1 December 2008

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:03, 1 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I wonder how we can restructure it so there is one discussion area for each item on the page, rather than one discussion for the whole page.		I wonder how we can restructure it so there is one discussion area for each item on the page, rather than one discussion for the whole page.
		+	:We need a proper bug-tracker, I think. Then we can get a much better idea of what's going on. P.S. Remember to sign comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>: [[User:Karaken12\|karaken12]] 13:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)