Difference between revisions of "AK-index segfault"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (attempt to improve grammar) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Scope of problem== | ==Scope of problem== | ||
I've tried to reproduce this bug, and it appears to be fixed in the 2.6-6 release of the GPL OpenQM GPL. Hence it should also be fixed in the CVS, but nobody has checked yet. | I've tried to reproduce this bug, and it appears to be fixed in the 2.6-6 release of the GPL OpenQM GPL. Hence it should also be fixed in the CVS, but nobody has checked yet. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' As of 22Jun12, this bug has been verified as fixed in the current source tree (Revision 98). ''' | ||
==Steps to reproduce== | ==Steps to reproduce== |
Latest revision as of 14:06, 22 June 2012
Scope of problem
I've tried to reproduce this bug, and it appears to be fixed in the 2.6-6 release of the GPL OpenQM GPL. Hence it should also be fixed in the CVS, but nobody has checked yet.
As of 22Jun12, this bug has been verified as fixed in the current source tree (Revision 98).
Steps to reproduce
Create a file called TESTFILE with a dictionary entry F1 of:
1: D 2: 1 3: 4: F1 5: 5R 6: S
Now run this program to get some data in:
open "TESTFILE" to file else stop for i = 1 to 2000 data = i write data to file, "rec":i next i data = '' for i = 2001 to 2100 write data to file, "rec":i next i end
Now
SELECT TESTFILE WITH F1 > 1500
works fine;
CREATE-INDEX TESTFILE F1 BUILD-INDEX TESTFILE F1 SELECT TESTFILE WITH F1 > 1500
Segfault.