Difference between revisions of "AK-index segfault"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Nudge Diccon to state version number with bug claims :-)) |
m (attempt to improve grammar) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Scope of problem== | ==Scope of problem== | ||
− | + | I've tried to reproduce this bug, and it appears to be fixed in the 2.6-6 release of the GPL OpenQM GPL. Hence it should also be fixed in the CVS, but nobody has checked yet. | |
==Steps to reproduce== | ==Steps to reproduce== |
Revision as of 15:32, 14 September 2009
Scope of problem
I've tried to reproduce this bug, and it appears to be fixed in the 2.6-6 release of the GPL OpenQM GPL. Hence it should also be fixed in the CVS, but nobody has checked yet.
Steps to reproduce
Create a file called TESTFILE with a dictionary entry F1 of:
1: D 2: 1 3: 4: F1 5: 5R 6: S
Now run this program to get some data in:
open "TESTFILE" to file else stop for i = 1 to 2000 data = i write data to file, "rec":i next i data = '' for i = 2001 to 2100 write data to file, "rec":i next i end
Now
SELECT TESTFILE WITH F1 > 1500
works fine;
CREATE-INDEX TESTFILE F1 BUILD-INDEX TESTFILE F1 SELECT TESTFILE WITH F1 > 1500
Segfault.